View Poll Results: Which set (A or B) looks better to you?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • A

    0 0%
  • B

    18 72.00%
  • I don't know / Can't tell

    7 28.00%
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Quality tests

  1. #1
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default Quality tests

    Which of these sets looks better to you? Let me know in the poll please! For clarification, A is first, then B is second. Also, if you don't see any images then you'll need to use a browser that displays PNG's.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A.png 
Views:	145 
Size:	322.3 KB 
ID:	1055   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A3.png 
Views:	142 
Size:	348.5 KB 
ID:	1056   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	A4.png 
Views:	126 
Size:	299.2 KB 
ID:	1057   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B.png 
Views:	144 
Size:	340.7 KB 
ID:	1058   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B3.png 
Views:	141 
Size:	366.7 KB 
ID:	1059   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	B4.png 
Views:	120 
Size:	323.2 KB 
ID:	1060  

    Last edited by Dot50Cal; 03-31-2008 at 03:16 PM.

  2. #2
    #27 Mr. X
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    650

    Default

    "B", but they are almost the same.

  3. #3
    #41 Kipepeo BLSR1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    1,412

    Default

    B is sharper but its only barely noticeable in Sets 1 and 2

  4. #4
    Elite Virus Scrubber
    A-J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,564

    Default

    the second set imo.

  5. #5
    #38 Ramon Salazar rewak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    1,200

    Default

    B for me as well, every so slightly sharper

  6. #6
    BSAA Jill Abuser Gradon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,457

    Default

    Same with everyone, B.

  7. #7
    #48 Executioner
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    2,117

    Default

    B it seems slightly shaper on the outlining of Mercenaries and the stitching on Leon's clothes.
    If he had a brain, he'd be dangerous.


  8. #8
    #03 Larva Bobelvago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Am I the only one who sees no change? I compared it and everything, yet I see no change or difference...v_V...

  9. #9
    Elite Virus Scrubber
    A-J's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,564

    Default

    Am I the only one who sees no change? I compared it and everything, yet I see no change or difference...v_V...
    look closer at the hair, textures etc, the B set is veeery slightly more sharp.

  10. #10
    #20 Hunter Beta
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    A Midwestern Town in North America
    Posts
    350

    Default

    They both look really close to me. B seems to be a bit sharper and more defined. It's a hard choice though since they look so much alike.

  11. #11
    #41 Kipepeo nemesis_lover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    A Lab in London
    Posts
    1,478

    Default

    A, i like to be diffrent


    ....ok maybe B

  12. #12
    #06 Crow U and S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    63

    Default

    They're both bad. A and B have colour banding an aliasing. I wish there was a proper HD version of Resident Evil 4 without the clipping of the Ganados and Leon's hand through doors as he pushes them and without the hideous colour banding on Leon's black top in dark areas.

  13. #13
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default

    Gamecube Devkits don't record video anyway.
    Last edited by Dot50Cal; 04-04-2008 at 08:40 PM.

  14. #14
    Boulder Incident Witness
    Mr_Zombie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    1,225

    Default

    I don't see any difference o_O

  15. #15
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Prime Blue View Post
    You never said we were talking videos here. ;)

    Single frame capturing makes it possible either way.
    Additionally, I'm pretty sure I've also seen a video capturing folder in the development kit, alongside the screenshot one.
    Theres no point since GCNrd can do that anyway. The quality leaves a lot to be desired when compared to a 480p capture.

  16. #16
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default

    Sure, but like I said, the differences are so slight I wont even bother. The cost of GCN Dev kits is on the decline, but they take up so much space as it is and I wouldn't be using it for anything but screenshots. Thats frowned upon, and I wouldn't want to take a kit out of someones hands who would do something with it. Heres some pictures samples I did. The shots on the right are off the frame buffer from GCNrd while the left is my capture card. A sharpen filter, and a quick color tweak (less green) and they'd nearly be 1:1, but I don't even go that far. When you introduce sharpening you need to increase the bitrate a lot or things get ugly. Its a slippery slope but you have to draw the line somewhere.

    Thanks for the responses everyone. Set A was captured while having the Wii in Widescreen mode, which seems to simply stretch the image to fit the screen, while Set B was the game in its native 4:3 mode (which when cropped nearly comes to 16:9 anyway). In the future I'll be doing 4:3 mode, as it takes up less HDD space and also looks better, thanks to sloppy widescreen implementation.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Dot50Cal; 04-05-2008 at 12:08 PM.

  17. #17
    THIA Staff


    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,226

    Default

    And also, for the Xbox XDK, if Dot was capturing for, say, Silent Hill 2, it has really, really sloppy video recording, that is pretty much worthless ;)

  18. #18
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default

    Any samples for that? Does it compress to a lossy codec?

  19. #19
    THIA Staff


    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    1,226

    Default

    I think its uncompressed by default. But no sound, and not a high framerate, 4:3 and no HD (All for the XBox 1, still dont have an XeDK so ><)

    http://www.ptop.aborman.com/index.ph...sk=view&id=131

    Video of it. If you pause it, it looks good, but still, framerate and no sound = blah

  20. #20
    War Horse Uranium
    Dot50Cal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    New York, USA
    Posts
    7,186

    Default

    I seen a video of someone's recording off a 360 kit and it looked considerably worse than my capture card, which is surprising. Seems like thats crap as well :|

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •