Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Recently Seen Films

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Canas Renvall
    replied
    I saw Killing Them Softly last night.

    Ho. Lee. Shit.

    Emphasis on Shit. You'd think a movie starring Brad Pitt, Sam Shepard, Richard Jenkins, James Gandolfini and Ray Liotta would be amazing. It just sounds great on paper.

    Somehow, it turned to complete and utter trash. Holy god. Brad Pitt's character was awesome, but even he couldn't save this shitstain of a film. I'm just so glad these movie tickets were free. The best part of the movie was the concession stand guy giving us three cups, then going to fill our Hobbit popcorn bucket (free refills until April), then my dad coming out from the bathroom and taking his drink to go fill it, the guy coming back and not realizing what happened, and giving us another cup thinking he'd forgotten one. $4.75 free, and it was nice since four people went (mom, dad, my boyfriend and myself) so mom and dad got what they wanted instead of sharing one cup.

    I cannot stress enough. That was the best part of the movie.

    I give it a 2/10. It would be 1/10, but Brad Pitt's character and acting bring it up a point. Everything else about the movie just hurt so bad.

    Leave a comment:


  • [STARS]TyranT
    replied
    The book Battle Royale doesn't feature a game show, that concept was only used in the absolute clusterfuckery that was the English translation of the manga. In the book, much like the film it's a program devised by the military, to keep youths in check.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheSelfishGene
    replied
    I watched Skyfall this afternoon.
    I haven't seen many other Bond films and didn't have too much invested, but I really really enjoyed it. Some really effective and tense scenes. I thought the film was building up to a much grander final act; but even the comparatively low key set-piece was enjoyable.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyndercute
    replied
    Originally posted by Wrathborne View Post
    I am so sorry Cyndercute..I'm not responsible for Hollywood, but dammit they sent over a huge bomb world wide.

    No one should watch 'Battleship' and no one should have to watch Rihanna act.
    I'm with you on that one. I still can't believe that she acted as a marine, poor bastards.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wrathborne
    replied
    I am so sorry Cyndercute..I'm not responsible for Hollywood, but dammit they sent over a huge bomb world wide.

    No one should watch 'Battleship' and no one should have to watch Rihanna act.

    Leave a comment:


  • cyndercute
    replied
    I watched Batteship and Chernobyl (I've got the poster!!!!!), no need to say that the second one scared me to death.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wrathborne
    replied
    Originally posted by Code_R View Post
    I preferred it when it was called The Running Man.


    Last watched - X-Men First Class. Still fun, still not enough Magneto revenge.
    Hunger games is closer to Battle Royale than Battle Royale is to the Running man. Though all 3 use the same concept, Battle Royale and the Running man used it as a game show.Though you dont get as much of a sense of it being a game show in the Battle Royale movie as you do th ebook.

    Leave a comment:


  • Pikminister
    replied
    Originally posted by Code_R View Post
    I preferred it when it was called The Running Man.
    And that was what I was actually referring to when I said "(The Hunger Games) Seemed like one of those typical 80's action flicks about running around killing people & set in a wonky futuristic world"

    I understand why teens consider this film brand new and original. But to someone like me, who has been watching films since the 80's, its not original. But I still found it somewhat entertaining. If a bit weak in terms of... everything (action, drama, acting, plot, etc.)

    BTW, I get a kick when young ones say that Merida (from the movie Brave) or even Hawkeye as seen in the Avengers, ripped off the Katniss character (they all practice archery you see... archery is totally new and no one did it in films, like ever.).
    Last edited by Pikminister; 11-27-2012, 01:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • alexdz
    replied
    Originally posted by aris13 View Post
    The Arnold Schwarzenegger movie?
    Yep.

    Leave a comment:


  • aris13
    replied
    Originally posted by Code_R View Post
    I preferred it when it was called The Running Man.
    The Arnold Schwarzenegger movie?

    Leave a comment:


  • Code_R
    replied
    Originally posted by Wrathborne View Post
    I preferred the Hunger games when it was "Battle Royale".
    I preferred it when it was called The Running Man.


    Last watched - X-Men First Class. Still fun, still not enough Magneto revenge.

    Leave a comment:


  • Grem
    replied
    Saw Skyfall yeasterday. Good movie, but I'm still nostalgic of past Bonds. Also I thought it kind of felt like a conclusion to the whole series and the Bond character.

    I don't know if it was better than Casino Royale, I should see it again to judge it properly.

    Leave a comment:


  • aris13
    replied
    Killer Joe by William Friedkin. A dark, funny and deadly neo noir.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wrathborne
    replied
    I preferred the Hunger games when it was "Battle Royale".

    I also caught Lincoln the other night with my father, been a long time since Speilberg made a movie thats more than Mediocre.
    He did a damn fine job on this film, Danial Day-Lewis was a fantastic Lincoln, Tommy Lee Jones was a hilarious Thadeus Stevens and the film was very adult. Had lots of amusing moments and in terms of historical accuracy this was pretty damn good.

    Didn't feel like a Spielberg film either, if you like historical films, as well as 'grown up' films, this is a good one.
    Not sure how many folks across the pond would be interested in the film as its about US history, as well as it does have 1 anti British joke(which given the time frame historically, we were friends with the British...but there was still some animosity).

    Leave a comment:


  • Pikminister
    replied
    "We" rented The Hunger Games ("we" as "I didn't")

    Not as bad as I thought it would be. Seemed like one of those typical 80's action flicks about running around killing people & set in a wonky futuristic world. And for some reason, almost everyone is wearing stuff that came out of Lady Gaga's closet.

    The plot was decent but it wasn't something worth making a film on. I suspect that if the books weren't the best sellers that they are and had a huge fanbase, this film wouldn't have been made at all (at least not with its current budget). The story is not worth the trouble IMO. Maybe the books were better at telling the story. I dunno.

    For example, the film sort of failed at depicting the relationship/bonding between Katniss and Rue in a proper manner. To the point where the audience would feel the impact of seeing one of those characters bite the big one. Rue needed more character development. Showing her doing kid stuff and talking about her fears and future plans and stuff. Making us hope that she makes it through. But I guess the producers of the film suspected everyone had read the books and so they just got got that quickly out of the way to set up the sequel.

    I have not seen Skyfall yet because I'm waiting to see it with my brother who is a big James Bond fan. I already heard that is one of the best Bond films of all time. So... man... can't wait.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X