Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Darkside Chronicles Character Discussion.
Collapse
X
-
Does anyone else not like how Leon and Krauser refer to Javier by his first name? Since when do military personnel refer to their targets on a first-name basis? As far as I'm concerned, it should be Operation: Hidalgo, and he should be referred to as such. Calling him by his first name makes it seem kind of...personal, like they know him themselves or something.
Comment
-
I actually think anything Leon does in terms of BOW's or Umbrella is personal. I specifically remember Krauser sayin: "What is it that you fight for, comrade?" and Leon replies with: "My past, I suppose." and Krauser mentions Umbrella right after it.
I'd just say everything is personal to him at that point.
Comment
-
I agree, but that wasn't my point. Let's say the Navy SEALs are going in after a target named Michael Johnson. Which sounds more likely of them to say: "Mike is in our sights" or "Johnson is in our sights"? It just sounds awkward for spec ops soldiers to be referring to an enemy on a first-name basis.
Comment
-
I agree. However, wouldn't they simply say "target is in sight" or something similar, as opposed to using any part of the individual's name?Originally posted by ChrisRedfield29 View PostI agree, but that wasn't my point. Let's say the Navy SEALs are going in after a target named Michael Johnson. Which sounds more likely of them to say: "Mike is in our sights" or "Johnson is in our sights"? It just sounds awkward for spec ops soldiers to be referring to an enemy on a first-name basis.
Either way, I'm sure we all agree that Operation: Javier is quite possibly the worst-named operation ever.Mass production? Ridiculous!
Comment
-
@PracticalAI Hahaha That just made my morning. Thank you for that. <3 Alfred.
But in other news, I'm honestly not at all sure about the new scenario. It...could go either way, really. Then again, anything past 4, I'm rather apathetic about. =/
Comment
-














Comment