Who's worse: Boll or Anderson?

[Darkmoon]

...you're gonna have to clarify which is which Dude.

[The Dude]

True, but who's worse, the guy you know's a failure or a terrible director who's successful at it?

Anderson gets my vote.

[Darkmoon]

Boll. As bad as the RE movies are they aren't anything compared to the pure, undiluted suck that comes off every project Uwe Boll touches. The man has an Epic Fail field. Everything he's involved with turns to Fail.

If Boll had done RE there wouldn't even be zombies in it. That's how bad that man is.

[Rombie]

Aside from the fact it has no poll attached.... this is like asking who do you like more... Hitler or Tony Blair. :p

Boll for sure. Anderson's movies are actually watchable and he doesn't just do videogame movies (his next film due is a remake of the cult 70's film Death Race 2000) unlike Boll who's basically never going to leave them now. Say what you will about the RE movies, but I'm happy to see them compared to the shit that Boll has done over the last several years.

[Helegad]

I've seen a massive amount of bitching about Paul WS Anderson's Resident Evil movies, and I want to know if people think that he's so bad, would he be worse than Uwe Boll? Personally, I think Boll is a total fucking 'tard.

Vote your answer!