The Sexuality Topic/Poll

[aShThErOt]

in addition to that, Judah also practiced the same rule.. (to use a crude example: boy, don't marry a nigger).. but in the same way we use words today, calling you nigger isn't necessarily race related.. the idea was further established in Moses' days.. a foreigner in the "don't marry a nigger" since, doesn't necessarily have anything to do with race, or country.. the Jews saw themselves as pilgrims in terms of their entire life in this world.. everyone else, regardless of country, or skin color, was foreign, and a nigger..

or a faggot..

[Vogue_Dirge]

Unfortunately, I could easily say the same thing about the pseudo-science in defense of homosexuality, as well as the ignorance homosexuals show towards Christianity. So yes, we will have to agree to disagree on this matter.

So if we no longer live under Mosiac Law, why should the bit about homosexuality still apply?

[Bertha]

Missionary is just fucked up. Having eye contact during sex? Fuck that.

You see....I like looking at him straight in the eye....that way when I give him a command, he knows its not a suggestion.

I think Bestiality is frowned upon because it's not consensual. They are an animal, they can not give clear consent.

As far as incest goes, I'm not against it. America holds such an extreme taboo against it. But I think any relationship between consenting adults is okay. Though they will have to deal with the consequences if any children become products of it.

Hell, I'm even in favor of polygamy. As long as the family unit it firm, people are getting their needs met, there is no abuse, and the children are being well taken care of.

Multiple husbands? Hell, I'd bite. More men to work, make money, and to plug me all at once. It's a win/win if you ask me.

...reverse cowgirl, then? Done and done, signed and sealed, raw-dog FTW.

Reverse cowgirl, cowgirl, sideways, against the wall, in the car...now its turning into...

YouTube video:

Show YouTube video

eh, not intending to offend you, but that's an amateur's take on the passage..

Onan wasn't "struck down for spilling his semen"..

Judah, his father, had given him Tamar to wed, but his mother was a racist, who didn't want him marrying a foreigner.. Bowing to his mother, he refused to impregnate Tamar..

It'd be like if your mother told you not to marry a nigger..

AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA Enjoy your stay buddy. I cant stop laughing. Good times, THIA!

[Vector]

It'd be like if your mother told you not to marry a nigger..

[aShThErOt]

Also, have you ever looked at the bible and what it says in a historical sense? The Hebrews were trying to build a nation, so naturally any act that does not produce children is seen as a sin. Bible even states if a man spills his seed upon the ground he will be struck down (there goes masturbation).

eh, not intending to offend you, but that's an amateur's take on the passage..

Onan wasn't "struck down for spilling his semen"..

Judah, his father, had given him Tamar to wed, but his mother was a racist, who didn't want him marrying a foreigner.. Bowing to his mother, he refused to impregnate Tamar..

It'd be like if your mother told you not to marry a nigger..

[REmaster]

All this talk about sex has made me hungry. Good bye thread, you will most likely be closed when I return from my roast beef and cigarette break.

[PracticalAl]

No offense, but that article sounds a lot like Christian propaganda. But we are going to have to agree to disagree because everything has its biased. And that article seems incredibly loaded with it, and it makes me laugh a little.Not to mention the article seems to blanket all homosexuals as the same, when we are quite as diverse as the heterosexual population. There is just so much ignorance when it comes to Christians and their views on the gay lifestyle. Frankly, they don't know anything really, and it seems they don't care to learn.

Unfortunately, I could easily say the same thing about the pseudo-science in defense of homosexuality, as well as the ignorance homosexuals show towards Christianity. So yes, we will have to agree to disagree on this matter.

Al. I'm curious to know what you think of the fact that in the area of the bible that state Homosexuality is a sin, it also states that eating shellfish, having round haircuts, and wearing clothing of mixed fibers?

Sure! Certain parts of the Bible are written and meant specifically for certain time periods, called dispensations. Most of the Old Testament is directed towards the people living in those times under the Mosaic Law. The shellfish verse was meant only for those people in that point in history. They did not have the proper cleaning or refrigeration methods to healthily eat shellfish, so God commanded them not to for their safety. The wearing clothing of mixed fibers was purported to teach purity. However, these verses are no longer commanded because we obviously do not live under Mosaic Law anymore!

Also, have you ever looked at the bible and what it says in a historical sense? The Hebrews were trying to build a nation, so naturally any act that does not produce children is seen as a sin. Bible even states if a man spills his seed upon the ground he will be struck down (there goes masturbation).

Of course! Half of the Bible is practically history, it's hard not to! You are going to have to provide the exact verses, and I will give you the proper interpretation. But offhand, these verses also sound like Mosaic Law commands, so again, not applicable to today.

...

EDIT:
Better, Mr Spencer? XD..

[Mr. Spencer]

You've destroyed this topic with your relevant posts.

[aShThErOt]

it's obvious how incest could cause a lot of dysfunction in a family.. i wasn't trying to advocate sister fucking.. just that i'd be more likely to fuck my sister, who could theoretically speaking, actually be an attractive, and fuckable female, than to have sex with a man..

[Vector]

Not so much throbbing...but then again, some days I'd rather just take the helm and take care of my business. Missionary be damned.

...reverse cowgirl, then? Done and done, signed and sealed, raw-dog FTW.

[Vogue_Dirge]

I think Bestiality is frowned upon because it's not consensual. They are an animal, they can not give clear consent.

As far as incest goes, I'm not against it. America holds such an extreme taboo against it. But I think any relationship between consenting adults is okay. Though they will have to deal with the consequences if any children become products of it.

Hell, I'm even in favor of polygamy. As long as the family unit it firm, people are getting their needs met, there is no abuse, and the children are being well taken care of.

[Wrathborne]

it's funny.. because i'd fuck my sister before i'd fuck a man.. i guess it's the Jew in me..

After reading that comment I'm wondering if there' anyway we can keep your posting level at cockroach.

[nemesiswontdie]

Missionary be damned.

Missionary is just fucked up. Having eye contact during sex? Fuck that.

[REmaster]

Wow. I think we have a serious contender for the best thread of 2011. The trophy was previously won earlier this year by A-J's thread about Outbreak 3.

[Bertha]

I'm straight, though I more often find woman more attractive than men, especially naked. A penis is never attractive.
.

Vaginas arent necessarily always sexy looking themselves. And really...I can honestly say I've seen some delicious wang.

it's funny.. because i'd fuck my sister before i'd fuck a man.. i guess it's the Jew in me..

I didn't think Jews fucked their sisters...unless they had pennies shoved...never mind.

YOU RAAAANG?

Not so much throbbing...but then again, some days I'd rather just take the helm and take care of my business. Missionary be damned.

oh shit...I didn't see Al's post for pro-beast relations. Cant breathe...cant stop laughing.