Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Sexuality Topic/Poll

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PracticalAl
    replied
    Originally posted by REmaster View Post
    While both same gender sex and sex with an animal are both non-productive, I think everyone looks down on Bestiality just because it's not with a human.
    But who are they to judge? If someone has a sexual relationship with an animal and is not harming anyone, why is it wrong?

    Originally posted by REmaster View Post
    On the other hand, incest couples can be productive, albeit the chances of a deformity increase. Honestly I had a crush on my cousin when I was a kid, and I still think she's extremely attractive. Of course I would never do anything... and before "duh you live in Kentucky"
    Again, same argument. What I am seeing in this thread is moral relativism. Basically, "if it feels right, it's right for me", along with the denial of any absolutes. Which in turn, makes the rejection of bestiality, pedophilia, incest, etc., hypocritical. (Haha, I live in Florida and there are surprisingly a lot of rednecks here. I would of not made that judgement towards you! )

    Originally posted by aShThErOt
    it's funny.. because i'd fuck my sister before i'd fuck a man.. i guess it's the Jew in me..
    I am Jewish and I do not share this sentiment.. :|..

    Leave a comment:


  • aShThErOt
    replied
    Bertha here is precisely why men should be ready to "meat" the supply to such a demand.. It's kindof cold to go galavanting after another guy, when there's a perfectly ready and able woman prepared to take in such delight.. Some gays are only responding to the the social taboo in the first place.. The same guys who say fags are going to hell, are usually not to keen on getting laid in general.. But letting that idea turn you into a fairy, rather than just getting some righteous pussy, like a man, just seems like a defeat to me..

    Leave a comment:


  • Vogue_Dirge
    replied
    No offense, but that article sounds a lot like Christian propaganda. But we are going to have to agree to disagree because everything has its biased. And that article seems incredibly loaded with it, and it makes me laugh a little.

    Not to mention the article seems to blanket all homosexuals as the same, when we are quite as diverse as the heterosexual population. There is just so much ignorance when it comes to Christians and their views on the gay lifestyle. Frankly, they don't know anything really, and it seems they don't care to learn.

    Al. I'm curious to know what you think of the fact that in the area of the bible that state Homosexuality is a sin, it also states that eating shellfish, having round haircuts, and wearing clothing of mixed fibers?

    Also, have you ever looked at the bible and what it says in a historical sense? The Hebrews were trying to build a nation, so naturally any act that does not produce children is seen as a sin. Bible even states if a man spills his seed upon the ground he will be struck down (there goes masturbation).

    Leave a comment:


  • Vector
    replied
    I think I just died and went to heaven.

    Leave a comment:


  • aShThErOt
    replied
    it's funny.. because i'd fuck my sister before i'd fuck a man.. i guess it's the Jew in me..

    Leave a comment:


  • Vector
    replied
    Originally posted by Bertha View Post
    As for me...straight. I love men. I enjoy nothing more than a long, thick, throbbing cock.


    YOU RAAAANG?

    Leave a comment:


  • REmaster
    replied
    Originally posted by PracticalAl View Post
    I said wasn't going to post anything more, but a few of your comments have gotten me very intrigued in the topic! Out of curiosity and the sport of debate, would anyone in support of homosexuality explain to me what makes homosexuality acceptable but incest and/or bestiality unacceptable?

    I'd also like to leave this here: http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/.../crj0107a.html in response to the "science behind homosexuality" posted earlier.

    Also,

    8D~~~~~ <3
    While both same gender sex and sex with an animal are both non-productive, I think everyone looks down on Bestiality just because it's not with a human. On the other hand, incest couples can be productive, albeit the chances of a deformity increase. Honestly I had a crush on my cousin when I was a kid, and I still think she's extremely attractive. Of course I would never do anything...

    and before "duh you live in Kentucky"
    Last edited by REmaster; 09-27-2011, 09:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • PracticalAl
    replied
    I said wasn't going to post anything more, but a few of your comments have gotten me very intrigued in the topic! Out of curiosity and the sport of debate, would anyone in support of homosexuality explain to me what makes homosexuality acceptable but incest and/or bestiality unacceptable?

    I'd also like to leave this here: http://www.iclnet.org/pub/resources/.../crj0107a.html in response to the "science behind homosexuality" posted earlier.

    Also,
    Originally posted by Vogue_Dirge View Post
    8D~~~~~ <3

    Leave a comment:


  • Vogue_Dirge
    replied
    KylieDog, are you saying I am a mutant?

    Leave a comment:


  • aShThErOt
    replied
    eh, my bit was done with the first post.. i was only being courteous, thereafter.. don't sweat it..

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr. Spencer
    replied
    Originally posted by KylieDog View Post
    I'm straight, though I more often find woman more attractive than men, especially naked. A penis is never attractive.


    It is of no concern to me if people are gay or straight, though I believe it is a genetic defect. I'll try explain why. In all species male and female are as an instinct meant to join with the other, it is in the genes and what makes a species survive. Now if those genes started to discourage breeding the species woud soon meet an end, seems a pretty defective gene to me.

    Of course we would never face this problem since if everyone turned gay we are intelligent enough to get around it or just flat out ignore instinct, however that wouldn't change a defective gene for what it is, the consequences just wouldn't be there. No different to an allergy gene, wouldn't treat someone with a allergy different, same problem, different result.

    And to repeat, it is of no concern to me if people are gay or straight. People shouldn't be concerned what two consenting adults get up to in privacy where no-one is harmed.
    Stop making productive posts!

    Leave a comment:


  • GuardhouseMusic
    replied
    Originally posted by Mr. Spencer View Post
    Taken is actually a documentary about Liam Neeson's life.
    Well, there's one inaccuracy. Liam Neeson didn't shoot his uncooperative friend's wife with a gun. He shot her with his cock. You can learn more every week as this podcast ends:

    http://smodcast.com/channels/hollywood-babble-on/
    Last edited by GuardhouseMusic; 09-27-2011, 08:44 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Inferno04
    replied
    Originally posted by aShThErOt View Post
    while i'm flattered that you think of me that way, you're a few digits short of my number.. i don't care nearly as much as you think i do.. if there were a reason to fight, i'd do it..

    i'm not interested in saving anyone.. anyone who would (in such regard) require saving, can drop dead for what it's worth..

    you're trying to paint me as the Batman.. i'm more like the Joker.. there's no point.. just a punchline..
    Would it be terribly rude to stop listening to you and go speak to somebody else?

    Yeah, good, I'm out of here. xD

    Leave a comment:


  • Dracarys
    replied
    I'm straight, though I more often find woman more attractive than men, especially naked. A penis is never attractive.


    It is of no concern to me if people are gay or straight, though I believe it is a genetic defect. I'll try explain why. In all species male and female are as an instinct meant to join with the other, it is in the genes and what makes a species survive. Now if those genes started to discourage breeding the species woud soon meet an end, seems a pretty defective gene to me.

    Of course we would never face this problem since if everyone turned gay we are intelligent enough to get around it or just flat out ignore instinct, however that wouldn't change a defective gene for what it is, the consequences just wouldn't be there. No different to an allergy gene, wouldn't treat someone with a allergy different, same problem, different result.

    And to repeat, it is of no concern to me if people are gay or straight. People shouldn't be concerned what two consenting adults get up to in privacy where no-one is harmed.

    Leave a comment:


  • aShThErOt
    replied
    while i'm flattered that you think of me that way, you're a few digits short of my number.. i don't care nearly as much as you think i do.. if there were a reason to fight, i'd do it..

    i'm not interested in saving anyone.. anyone who would (in such regard) require saving, can drop dead for what it's worth..

    you're trying to paint me as the Batman.. i'm more like the Joker.. there's no point.. just a punchline..

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X